Opening's Dead
It had cost me a socially awkward year of practice and revision to polish this story to that level of charm—and it was well worth the effort, it seemed. The ability to “open” any girl was an investment that far exceeded the bloopers and awkwardness that had afforded it.
I’d spew this story like a traveling salesman, flitting from girl to girl with the “perfect opener.” Women giggled, men cried, and I seemed unstoppable. To my friends and wingmen, it appeared as if I could pickup women faster than a speeding bullet. I was the superman of “opening.”
Unfortunately, the problem—as I later realized—was that “opening” doesn’t lead to sex or romance with women. It only leads to superficial conversations and flaky phone numbers. Despite having the “perfect opener,” I was batting a fat 0 when it came to closing.
And it doesn’t matter if your opener is direct or indirect, funny or serious, canned or “natural.” No matter how you “open,” you’ve bought yourself a one-way ticket to a conversation. That’s because an opener depends on words.
Whenever you open up your mouth to spew words, there’s an implicit assumption that you’re expecting a response in words. Obviously, “opinion openers” betray this assumption flagrantly—baiting a woman to give a “quick female opinion.” However, in a less obvious but equally axiomatic way, any “opener” is setting you up for a verbal response.
And that’s why the entire concept of an “opener” is flawed. Openers were designed to get a woman to respond with words. And guess what: no one’s ever put a condom on to exchange words. If you’re looking to meet, attract, and seduce women, words aren’t going to help you much.
Rather than words, what you want is emotion. Emotion doesn’t “open” women—it turns them on. Guys who spew openers are hoping they get a conversation, whereas guys who can elicit emotions know they’re going to get a girl. That’s because women response to emotions—not words.
Quickly, Zack calmed her down enough to take her number. Later that night, Zack’s phone wouldn’t stop buzzing with text messages from this girl. In her broken English, she begged Zack to meet her back at her hotel that night. At one point Zack turned the phone to me so I could read the text: “The way you grabbed me got me wet!!!”
Zack looked at me with a toothy smile, nodded his head, and snarled, “That’s the text players get!” While Zack will never live that hilariously cheesy moment down, the sentiment was dead-on. There are certain responses regular guys get, and then there are responses players get. Girls telling you that you got them wet certainly qualify as the latter.
The emphasis shifts from “what to say” to “how she feels.” As long as you get a woman feeling something you win (even if it’s a negative emotion, as in the case of Zack). If you can get a woman emotional using words, great. Do it. There’s nothing inherently wrong about beginning an interaction with words; the “wrongness” lies in the intent.
Are you trying for a conversation or are you trying for emotions? I can tell you from extensive research: conversations lead nowhere and emotions lead to the bedroom. Plain and simple.
I don’t mean to sound polemical, trying to convince you that “everything you know about women is wrong.” But chances are that everything you know about beginning an interaction with women is wrong.
If getting women emotional isn’t your primary objective, you’re severely handicapping yourself. Most of the problems you’re probably experiencing in your pickup attempts probably stem from this fundamental mistake.
Begin your interactions with women on the right foot. Start with the right foundation. Even if you knew the perfect opener—which I once did—it wouldn’t help you actually attract women. It’d only help you get conversations.
If you’re playing this game to meet, attract, and seduce women, reexamine your intentions. Ditch the opener.
- Login or register to post comments
- Trackback URL



6 comments
interesting article but i'm
interesting article but i'm curious about how zack "calmed down" the girl after he grabbed her. it seems to me like that's where the real "game" lies, i mean if everybody could just grab girls arms and get numbers it would be easy, whats the difference between a regular guy who just gets yelled at and Zack?
I'm in total agreement
Aside from the fact that I haven't tried this enough, the times I did try, I was shocked and amazed at the results. Eg (actually happened), at a pub, here in town, I approached a woman in a group of ladies that we had been partying with andI had had my eye on. This was my first interaction with her and my line was simple "Lucky for you that you have a wedding ring on, otherwise I'd be all over you", Response, "So". My next comment, "But, you're married" Response "So". Her face was pressed against mine, our lips touching as we spoke. Talk about IOI
's. Yes I could have had her, but that karma thing kicked in and I decided to take the high road. I have tried the openers, but I have to agree, long, drawn out conversation,...eventually tapers off. Unless the chick really digs you, it can be murder when you run out of stuff to say or talk about. Also, I'm fearing that women have caught on to much ofthe techniques and canned material floating around in the seduction community. Why not just go for the kill?
This great for a snap
This not just just 4 the fly by and the average person. Exactly why not just go for the kill> any mentaly insane person could make out with girl without meeting her or you could be pussy and play it safe
or play along?
Karma is bitch when these so called "single ladies" appear its not a trap its diversion from the real deal move on and pounce on an other target
Good article, but it's not
Good article, but it's not going to help anyone. Simply saying "make her feel something" is much easier than telling how to do that. You fell into the trap of many helpers by saying to do something but not telling or showing how to do that. Good article, just not very helpful.
I can see what your saying
I agree
Opening is easy for me now...
Opening is easy for me now... closing takes some patience. I'm batting a .250 right now, which is still better than where I was a year ago!